![]() It was not part of care guidelines for those who may be living at home. For example, in a search of remote monitoring in standards of care for heart failure, remote monitoring is recommended for patients in skilled nursing facilities. “Today, AHRQ’s resources don’t achieve their full potential for driving care transformation toward the Quadruple Aim because AHRQ and the stakeholders who can benefit from them do not share an understanding of how these resources can be best delivered and used to enhance clinical workflow, information flow, and outcomes.” – Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality ACTS Supports the Quadruple AimĮven more concerning is that professional standards of care rarely include notation of whether and for which service digital tools effectively provide the service or step integral to the standard of care. ![]() AHRQ states, with regards to adoption of connected care (e.g., digital medicine tools): Later publications, on the role of mobile applications included a limited effort to evaluate patient experience. The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) evidence-based practice center publications on telehealth focused on health outcomes provides the information that all stakeholders need. Why would patients or providers use this tool?Ĭurrently Available Clinical Evidence and Needed Shifts.How can it be operationalized for patients, for providers?.What does the innovation do for patients, for providers?.The information needed to adopt these innovations for both patients and providers includes: Without clear information addressing the patient and provider experience, there is no incentive for patients or providers to adopt these tools because they do not understand how and why they should be implemented into daily work or life. “Only one study has surveyed patients with hypertension in the outpatient clinic setting about use and preferences of ICTs for information and communication.” – BMC Patient Preferences for Using Technology in Communication About Symptoms Post Hospital Dischargeįor patients and providers, the lack of evidence addressing their key issues and questions is at the heart of uneven and slow adoption of connected care. ![]() Simply, patients and providers are the integral users of connected care and clinical evidence needs to provide the full range of information for patients and providers to evaluate and use these innovations. While important, these evaluations and pilots fall short of the information needed by patients, providers and even payers for adoption.Įven though connected care is a means of exchanging information between patients and clinicians that is fundamental to care directions, medication dosing and coordination of services, evaluations and pilots that document patient engagement and preferences, provider workflows, and the role of these tools to deliver services are integral to standards of care lags. The bulk of the clinical evidence published on connected care innovations addresses the innovation’s impact on health outcomes, while pilots of innovations generally examine both costs and outcomes.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |